Legal Opinion

Waterbury Lock & Specialty Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 2, 1946No. (C. D. 1025)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

The merchandise before us, exported from Germany and entered at the port of Boston, consists of small metal disks measuring approximately one-fourth inch in diameter and one-eighth inch in thickness. The center has been pierced, leaving a hole about one-sixteenth inch in diameter, reamed on both sides. The outer surface of the disk is smooth but the edges have been beveled.

These disks were entered at 35 per centum ad valorem as lock washers under paragraph 330 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This was clearly erroneous. They were classified as washers at six-tenths of 1 cent…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. American Bead Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  2. F. Vitelli & Son v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Davis Turner & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  4. Baldwin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1902
  5. Zucca v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  2. Buegeleisen & Jacobson, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  3. Stekert v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  4. Curtig Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  5. Curtig Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API