Legal Opinion

Border Brokerage Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 14, 1958No. C. D. 2020PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mollison, Judge:

The 68 protests enumerated in the schedule attached to and made a part of this decision were consolidated for trial. They involve importations of sperm oil from Canada which were assessed with duty at the rate of 3% cents per gallon under the provisions of paragraph 52 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Presidential proclamation reported in T. D. 51802. , The claim made in each of the protests is for duty at the rate of l}i cents per gallon under the said paragraph, as modified. The competing provisions read as follows:

Oils, animal and fish:

Sperm, crude_per gal.

Sperm…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Sheldon & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  2. F. Vitelli & Son v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. United States v. Danker & MarstonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  4. Vitelli v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  5. Carey & Skinner, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mitsubishi International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
  2. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API