Border Brokerage Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Mollison, Judge:
The 68 protests enumerated in the schedule attached to and made a part of this decision were consolidated for trial. They involve importations of sperm oil from Canada which were assessed with duty at the rate of 3% cents per gallon under the provisions of paragraph 52 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Presidential proclamation reported in T. D. 51802. , The claim made in each of the protests is for duty at the rate of l}i cents per gallon under the said paragraph, as modified. The competing provisions read as follows:
Oils, animal and fish:
Sperm, crude_per gal.
Sperm…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Sheldon & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- F. Vitelli & Son v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. Danker & MarstonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Vitelli v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- Carey & Skinner, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mitsubishi International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
- Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960