Legal Opinion
Todd Mattox v. Adam Edelman
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 15, 2017No. 16-1412PublishedCited by 315 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Todd Mattox, a Michigan prisoner, appeals from the orders entered by the district court granting various disposi-tive motions filed against Mattox’s Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claims against three doctors and a physician’s assistant who allegedly provided him deficient care for his heart condition. On appeal, Mattox argues that the district court erred in: (i) granting summary judgment on his claims against Defendants Haresh Pandya and William Borgerding for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; (ii) sua sponte dismissing his claims…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by315 opinions
- Lewis Rhinehart v. Debra ScuttCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Charlie Jackson v. R. FongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- John Does 8-10 v. Rick SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Asheton S. Morgan v. Tony TrierweilerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- Adrian Anthony v. Shannon SwansonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
310 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.