Legal Opinion

Fuller v. Mayor of Jackson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1890PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to Jackson. (Peck, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Plaintiff brought suit for damages claimed to have resulted from a defective sidewalk. Defendant pleaded the general issue. Verdict and judgment were for the plaintiff. After the jury had been called, but before they were sworn, defendant's counsel objected to swearing the jury, or proceeding with the trial, because:

1. The declaration is drawn as if plaintiff had a common-law right to the action therein mentioned, and does not refer to or count upon the statute which authorizes a suit for injuries caused by a defective sidewalk.

2. The place of the accident is not sufficiently described, it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dundas v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. McArthur v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad v. SouthwickMichigan Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fuller v. Mayor of JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Weeren v. Evening News Assn.Michigan Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Finch v. Village of BangorMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Styles v. Village of DecaturMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Susich v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API