Legal Opinion

Ostrom v. Woodbury

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 1, 1912No. Civ. No. 910Published

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Sierra County denying a new trial. Stanley A. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The complaint in this action is in three counts: 1. For the sum of $267, alleged to have been loaned by plaintiff to the defendant; 2. On a promissory note for the sum of $500 and interest, said note having been, it is alleged, executed in favor of and delivered to plaintiff by the defendant; and 3. On a promissory note executed by defendant in the sum of $500 in favor of one Richard Lindvall, the latter haying assigned said note, to the plaintiff.

The court found in favor of plaintiff on all the counts of the complaint, and thereupon caused to be entered in favor of. plaintiff judgment for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Herd v. TuohyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Daggett v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Bailey v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  4. Eidinger v. SigwartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  5. Herman v. HechtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API