Hart v. State

Lake, Ch. J.

The errors assigned in this case may be conveniently classed under four heads: First. Eulings respecting the competency of certain persons to serve as jurors. Second. The restriction of counsel in their argument to the jury. Third. Eulings in the charge to the jury. Fourth. The insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. The last of these objections does not seem to be relied on, however, as it is not even mentioned by counsel in their brief Therefore we will only say of it that, after a careful reading of the record, our minds are left in no doubt on that point, and we…