Legal Opinion
Flexible Manufacturing Systems Pty Ltd. v. Super Products Corp.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided December 22, 1994No. 89-C-1032PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WARREN, Senior District Judge.
Now before the Court is the motion of defendant Super Products Corporation (“Super Products”) to vacate an arbitration award in favor of plaintiff Flexible Manufacturing Systems Pty Ltd. (“Flexible”) for a breach of contract. For the following reasons, this motion will be denied.
I. BACKGROUND
In 1988, Flexible and Super Products entered into a contract (“License Agreement”) which enabled Flexible, an Australian company, to manufacture, sell, and operate certain proprietary vacuum loading products owned and manufactured by Super Products, a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Morton M. Hill, Jr. v. Norfolk and Western Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Ethyl Corporation v. United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-Clc and Local No. 7441, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-ClcCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Roadway Package System, Inc. v. Scott Kayser D/B/A Quality Express Scott KayserCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Mount Diablo Medical Center v. Health Net of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Del Piano v. Merrill LynchNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- M & L Power Services, Inc. v. American Networks InternationalDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1999
- Universal Insurance v. Warrantech Consumer Product Services, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.