Legal Opinion

Mount Diablo Medical Center v. Health Net of California, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 28, 2002No. A096018PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

POLLAK, J.

We confront what one commentator has characterized as “the thorny question of contract construction raised by the generic choice-of-law clause” in an agreement calling for the resolution of disputes by arbitration. Appellant Health Net of California, Inc. (Health Net) appeals from the denial of its petition to compel arbitration of the claims of respondent Mount Diablo Medical Center (Mt. Diablo) and to stay the litigation in which Mt. Diablo asserts those claims. The trial court denied the petition under Code of Civil Procedure section 1281.2, subdivision (c) (hereafter…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Cronus Investments, Inc. v. Concierge ServicesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Acquire II, Ltd. v. Colton Real Estate GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Pinela v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Rodriguez v. American Technologies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Garrison v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API