Ward v. Crane
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of tbe Superior Court of Los An-geles County and from an order refusing a new trial. J. W. McKinley, Judge. The facts are stated in tbe opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, C.
Action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The defendants employed .Kelley to do the carpenter work hereinafter specified at an agreed compensation of two dollars and fifty cents per day. His labor amounted to one hundred and five dollars, of which forty dollars has been paid, leaving due the sum of sixty-five dollars, for which he filed a lien.
Kelley died after the cause was tried, and his administrator was substituted. Findings and judgment were for the plaintiff, and this appeal is from an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial, which motion is based upon the alleged…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tunis v. Lakeport Agricultural Park Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Sachse v. AuburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Eaton v. MalatestaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dean v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Standard Lumber Co. v. FieldsWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Home Building & Loan Ass'n v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Arthur Morgan Trucking Co. v. ShartzerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1943
- Ketcham v. Land Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.