Legal Opinion
Morimanno v. Taco Bell
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided July 17, 1997No. 1:96-cv-00121PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. LEE, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the court on Plaintiffs’ respective Petitions for Award of Attorney’s Fees and Litigation Expenses. Defendant Taco Bell challenges those Petitions, contending that Plaintiffs are entitled either to no fees or to reduced fees. For the reasons stated herein, the court orders Taco Bell to pay attorney’s fees and expenses to Michelle Morimanno in the amount of $60,-471.75 and to Nichole Walls in the amount of $44,619.31.
BACKGROUND
On March 20,1997, a jury in the Northern District of Indiana, Fort Wayne Division,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- William McNabola v. Chicago Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Darnell Cooper and Anthony Davis v. Michael CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rice v. Sunrise Express, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2002
- Moore v. University of Notre DameDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1998
- DOES I, II, III v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Aynes v. Space Guard Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2001
- Garcia v. R.J.B. Properties, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.