Legal Opinion

Smith v. Peck

California Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1900No. Sac. No. 487PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Ida M. Gusha recovered a judgment in the justice’s court of township Ho. 2 of the county of Placer, May 19, 1894, against the Columbia Gold and Silver Mining Company. March 21, 1895, she signed and acknowledged an assignment of this judgment to the plaintiff herein, which was received hy him about a week thereafter. April 1, 1895, the amount of the judgment (three hundred and fifteen dollars and sixty-eight cents) was paid to the defendant Peck, who was at that time the justice of the peace for that township, and a satisfaction of the judgment was then entered by him on the margin of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McCluskey v. National Life Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Swing v. LingoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. McGown v. DalzellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. Snow v. WestUtah Supreme Court · 1910
  4. W. P. Herbert Co. v. PowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Alaska Gold Recovery Co. v. Northern Mining & Trading Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API