Legal Opinion
State v. Thomas
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 15, 2006No. 2004 KW 2805 RPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
928 So.2d 649 (2006)
STATE of Louisiana
v.
James THOMAS and Percy Dyer.
No. 2004 KW 2805 R.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.
February 15, 2006.
Kristi Haygood, Paul Knight, Assistant Attorneys General, Department of Justice, Baton Rouge, Counsel for Plaintiff State of Louisiana.
Leo J. Berggreen, Baton Rouge, Counsel for Defendants James Thomas and Percy Dyer.
Before: WHIPPLE, DOWNING and HUGHES, JJ.
DOWNING, J.
In this counseled criminal writ application, the relators, James Thomas and Percy Dyer, seek review of the trial court's ruling denying their motion to quash, wherein they claimed…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. RomeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
- State v. DevitoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. KennedySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- State v. DyerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006