Legal Opinion

State v. Rome

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 14, 1994No. 93-K-1221PublishedCited by 134 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

630 So.2d 1284 (1994)

STATE of Louisiana

v.

Joseph A. ROME.

No. 93-K-1221.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 14, 1994.

Rehearing Denied February 10, 1994.

Arthur A. Lemann, III, Martha L. Adams, New Orleans, for applicant.

Richard P. Ieyoub, Atty. Gen., New Orleans, George H. Ware, Jr., Clinton, for respondent.

CALOGERO, Chief Justice.[*]

We granted certiorari in this case to determine whether the state has delayed commencement of trial beyond the period allowed by law, and whether, as a consequence, charges against the defendant should be dismissed. More particularly, does a motion for a change of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  2. State v. CranmerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  3. State v. DrieverSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  4. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  5. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by134 opinions

  1. State v. LathanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. State v. WearySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
  3. State v. RomarSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  4. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  5. State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000

129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API