Legal Opinion

State v. Morris

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 18, 2000No. 99-KK-3235PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

755 So.2d 205 (2000)

STATE of Louisiana

v.

Joseph MORRIS.

No. 99-KK-3235.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2000.

PER CURIAM:[*]

The ruling of the trial court is reversed and this case is remanded to the district court for purposes of rehearing the motion to quash.

The trial court erred in giving the state the benefit of the doubt on the issue of prescription. Once the accused shows that the state has failed to bring him to trial within the time periods specified by La.C.Cr.P. art. 578, the state bears a heavy burden of demonstrating that either an interruption or a suspension of the time limit…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. RomeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. State v. CranmerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  3. State v. FabacherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  4. State v. JosephSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  5. State v. HarrisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State v. LathanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. State v. JonesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. State v. BuckleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. State v. TillmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. State v. LoganLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API