Legal Opinion
Barrett-Smith v. Barrett-Smith
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 25, 2002No. 25623-1-IIPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
38 P.3d 1030 (2002)
In re the Marriage of Charles BARRETT-SMITH, Respondent and Cross-Appellant,
v.
Cindy BARRETT-SMITH, Appellant and Cross-Respondent.
No. 25623-1-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
January 25, 2002.
Nathan James Neiman, Attorney At Law, Redmond, Counsel for Appellant.
Edward Marshall Lane, Smith Alling Lane P.s., Tacoma, Counsel for Respondent.
QUINN-BRINTNALL, J.
On the opening day of a dissolution trial, Cindy Barrett-Smith moved for a continuance based on her medical condition and lack of representation. The judge pro tempore denied her request. On appeal, Cindy…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. BrittonWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Green Mountain School District No. 103 v. DurkeeWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. FranksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Bullock v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Whitney v. BucknerWashington Supreme Court · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smith v. MonsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Smith v. MonsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Estate of Garner v. SchindlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Barela v. PutkaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006