Legal Opinion
Barela v. Putka
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 15, 2006No. 04-35096Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Juan Barela appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that the Woodland (Washington) Municipal Court, Cowlitz County Superior Court, and four individual judges violated his constitutional rights during proceedings related to a misdemeanor theft charge that was subsequently dismissed. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal based on judicial immunity. Moore v. Brewster, 96 F.3d 1240, 1243 (9th Cir.1996). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed all claims against the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Moore v. BrewsterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Jean L. Richards v. Hal Harper, Max Baucus, and Pat WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Barrett-Smith v. Barrett-SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002