Legal Opinion

Smith v. Monson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 12, 2010No. 28561-8-IIIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

¶1 Standing to assert a claim in equity resides in the party entitled to equitable relief; it is not dependent on the legal relationship of those parties. Here, the plaintiff conveyed property to a relative so that relative could borrow money for the plaintiff to buy a mobile home. The bank would not loan the plaintiff the money. The plaintiff paid off the loan, but the relative conveyed the property by quitclaim deed to other family members, ostensibly so they would have “access” to the property. The court concluded that the plaintiff did not have standing to challenge the conveyance and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Vasquez v. HawthorneWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. SainCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  3. Fleishbein v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Hoover v. BouffleurWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Bates v. GlaserWashington Supreme Court · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. GLEPCO, LLC v. ReinstraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Collings v. City First Mortgage Services, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. Aaron & Jaime Reinstra v. Glepco, Llc And Greg & Pamela HintonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. Donald And Beth Collings, Resp/cross App v. City First Mortgage ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. Donald And Beth Collings, Resp/cross App v. City First Mortgage ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API