Legal Opinion

Eddy v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided July 6, 1915PublishedCited by 13 opinions

At Law. Action by C. J. Eddy against the Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company and the Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company. On motion to remand to state court.

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, District Judge.

Motion to remand. This is an action at law, brought in the district court at St. Pa.nl, Minn., for $3,208.97 damages and interest for the alleged failure to properly transport a consignment of sheep and lambs from Columbus, Mont, and Big Timber, Mont., to Chicago, Ill. The plaintiff is a citizen of Montana, and both of the defendants are organized under the laws of Wisconsin and are citizens of that state. The defendant Omaha Company holds its stockholders’ and directors’ meetings in the state of its organization, but maintains offices in St. Paul, Minn., for the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. In Re MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Ex Parte WisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Smith v. LyonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Boatmen's Bank v. FritzlenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  5. Burck v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Vadner v. VadnerDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1918
  3. Bradley v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1951
  4. Brantley v. Augusta Ice & Coal Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1943
  5. Ostrom v. EdisonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API