Legal Opinion

Markle v. Robert Hall Clothes

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 5, 1963No. Appeal, 303PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Bell,

Appellant instituted a trespass action against appellee, the owner of a so-called “low overhead” clothing store in Wilkes-Barre, to recover damages for personal injuries.

Clothing sold by the appellee was displayed on racks; the racks were made of pipe and were not attached to the floor. In the part of appellee’s store where the plaintiff was injured, there were several parallel rows of such racks, adjacent rows being separated by aisles approximately 34 inches wide. When plaintiff, accompanied by her daughter, Mrs. Butler, was walking along one of the aisles…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lanni v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Flagiello v. CrillySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Schofield v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Jerominski v. Fowler, Dick & WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Rogers v. Max Azen, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Amon v. ShemakaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Zeman v. Canonsburg BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. APPLE v. ReichertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Repyneck v. TarantinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Taylor v. Churchill Valley Country ClubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API