Legal Opinion

City and Borough of Juneau v. Quinto

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1984No. S-4PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Chief Justice.

The issue in this case is one involving an individual’s right to privacy under the Alaska Constitution. 1 The question to be determined is whether a tape recording of a suspect’s conversation with a police officer was properly admitted into evidence at the suspect’s trial, when the suspect knew, or reasonably should have known, that he was speaking to a police officer, but was not aware that the officer was recording their conversation. We hold that the tape recording was properly admitted.

I

The recording in question was made by a Juneau police officer, Karl…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. GlassAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Palmer v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Quinto v. City and Borough of JuneauCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Stephan v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. VlietHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Doe v. Alaska Superior Court, Third Judicial DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. City of Kennewick v. DayWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. City of Kennewick v. DayWashington Supreme Court · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API