Legal Opinion

City of Kennewick v. Day

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 2000No. 67994-1PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

Doug R. Day was convicted by a Benton County District Court jury of possession of marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia. At trial, Day asserted the defense of “unwitting possession.” The trial court excluded testimony regarding Day’s reputation for sobriety from drugs and alcohol, finding this was not evidence of a “pertinent trait of character” under ER 404(a)(1). We hold that the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to admit the proffered testimony and, accordingly, reverse and remand for a new trial.

FACTS

On November 4, 1996, Day was stopped for investigation of driving…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. BourgeoisWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. CrenshawWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. RikerWashington Supreme Court · 1994

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. KinnemanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. KinnemanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. FryWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. FryWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. Perez-ValdezWashington Supreme Court · 2011

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API