Legal Opinion

Lane v. Lane

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 10, 1953No. Civ. 19246PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

Upon a hearing of an order to show cause re modification of an interlocutory decree of divorce, defendant was required to pay plaintiff $200 per month for her support until the further order of the court. Defendant appeals.

Plaintiff filed suit for divorce on January 3, 1949, charging defendant with extreme cruelty. They were married in July, 1932, and separated in December, 1945. There were no children. Plaintiff attached to her complaint as an exhibit, and by reference made it a part thereof, a copy of “a property settlement agreement . . . dividing their community property and providing for…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Adams v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Puckett v. PuckettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Western Coal & Mining Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fox v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Freeman v. SAN DIEGO ASSN. OF REALTORSCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Warnack v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
  4. DuValle v. DuValleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  5. Jackson v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API