Legal Opinion

Hermann v. Brownell

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 25, 1960No. 15233PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, District Judge.

When a case is appealed from this Court to the Supreme Court, this Court completely loses jurisdiction of the cause. Thereafter, our jurisdiction cam be revived only upon the mandate of the-Supreme Court itself, and even upon such restoration, the jurisdiction of this Court is rigidly limited to those points, ancE those points only, specifically consigned to our consideration by the Supreme Court.

In the instant case, this Court is functioning under such a remand. Consequently, our jurisdiction is strictly limited by the Supreme Court’s mandate. That mandate is our compass…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Herrmann v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Herrmann v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  3. Koehler v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,030 Henry T. Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  2. Joanne Kotler, Individually and as Administratrix, Etc. v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  3. Westerngeco L.L.C. v. Ion Geophysical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  4. Nelson v. White (In Re White)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 1986
  5. Biggins v. the Hazen Paper Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API