Legal Opinion

Herrmann v. Rogers

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 26, 1959No. 572PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to it, to consider whether, under the law of property of Idaho, it was possible, after the time of the making of the conveyance, for any person other than the named beneficiaries of the trust to acquire a property interest in it (other than through a named beneficiary), and, in the light of its determination as to this, to reconsider its holding that respondent was entitled to all the trust funds remaining in the hands of the trustee.

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mtr. of City of New York (Usa Coblentz)New York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Hermann v. BrownellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  3. First National Bank v. KirschmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. Riley v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. In Re Trusteeship Under Will of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API