Legal Opinion

In re D.A.Q.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 16, 2011No. COA10-1325Published

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

Juvenile D.A.Q. appeals from the trial court’s order requiring him to pay $242.58 in restitution after he was adjudicated delinquent of two counts of feloniously breaking and entering a motor vehicle. We reverse and remand for further findings of fact because the trial court failed to make any findings regarding whether restitution is in the juvenile’s best interest and whether the restitution was fair to the juvenile.

*536Facts

The State’s evidence tended to show the following facts. On 24 April 2010, 13-year-old D.A.Q. (“Danny”) and another juvenile, D.W. (“Dale”),1 broke into two…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Charnock v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. In Re HeilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Bell v. LaceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Matter of RegisterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. In Re SchrimpsherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API