Matter of Register
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Chief Judge.
Because of the discussion to follow regarding the payment of compensation to Mrs. Radliff for damages done to her house in these and other cases, it is necessary and appropriate to point out that we are not in the least critical of Mrs. Radliff s efforts to be compensated for the extensive damage done to her home and personal property. We understand her agony and support the proposition that victims of crime should be compensated whenever possible. We endorse the discriminate and prudent use of restitution in juvenile cases as provided in G.S. 7A-649, but compensation of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. SpicerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Matter of JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. . YearganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re HeilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- In re T.E.F.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
- In re J.B.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Matter of Kenyon N.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Matter of GrovesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.