Legal Opinion
Stickney v. Sunlight Construction, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 12, 1998No. AC 17181PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, J.
The defendant Commercial Union Insurance Companies (Commercial Union) appeals from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board (board) affirming the commissioner’s decision to *611open and modify a voluntary agreement between the plaintiff, Brian Stickney, and his employer, the defendant Sunlight Construction, Inc. (Sunlight), and to substitute Commercial Union for Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (Aetna) as the insurer of Stickney’s claim.1 On appeal, Commercial Union claims that the board improperly concluded that (1) the workers’ compensation commission had…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Dodd v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Powers v. Hotel Bond Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Figueroa v. C & S Ball BearingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Crochiere v. Board of Education of Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brinson v. Finlay Bros. Printing Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Stickney v. Sunlight Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Shritah v. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Stickney v. Sunlight Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998