Legal Opinion
Berry & Murphy, P.C. v. Carolina Casualty Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 12, 2009No. 09-1004PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-Appellants Berry & Murphy, P.C. and Timothy H. Berry, P.C. (“plaintiffs”) appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Defendant-Appellee Carolina Casualty Insurance Company (“Carolina Casualty”) on plaintiffs’ claim for insurance coverage for a malpractice lawsuit. Plaintiffs filed their action in state court and Carolina Casualty removed the case to federal court, alleging diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The district court concluded that Carolina Casualty had no duty to defend or indemnify plaintiffs because a claim was first made…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bay Cities Paving & Grading, Inc. v. Lawyers' Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Pittsburg, Inc. v. Pepsico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Chacon v. American Family Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Wood Bros. Homes, Inc. v. Walker Adjustment BureauSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- Butler v. ComptonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Thomas v. DurastantiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Cavanaugh v. Woods Cross CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Merrifield v. COUNTY COM'RS FOR COUNTY OF SANTA FECourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- COLUMBIAN FINANCIAL CORP. v. BancInsure, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Cornhusker Casualty Company v. SkajCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.