Legal Opinion

E. Rauh & Sons Fertilizer Co. v. Shreffler

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 1, 1943No. 9497PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONS, Circuit Judge.

Removed from the state court because of diversity of citizenship and tried to a jury, the cause resulted in a judgment for the appellee for damages to his growing plants proximately resulting from injurious gases generated by the fertilizer plant of the appellant. The judgment is assailed upon the ground that it was not supported by substantial evidence, and that the cause was submitted to the jury upon an erroneous view of the law of nuisance and the measure of damages.

The appellee is an experienced grower of gladioli. In 1940 he planted 11 acres of his farm near Toledo…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States Smelting Co. v. SisamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
  2. Ohio Stock Food Co. v. GintlingOhio Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. United Verde Copper Co. v. RalstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
  4. Wichers v. New Orleans Acid & Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  5. Louisville Brick & Tile Co. v. CalmelatOhio Court of Appeals · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Morgan v. High Penn Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. Foster Boat Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  3. In Re the Complaint of Oswego Barge Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1977
  4. Maier v. Publicker Commercial Alcohol Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad v. the Ship FernviewDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API