Legal Opinion

Bangor & Aroostook Railroad v. the Ship Fernview

District Court, D. Maine

Decided August 10, 1978No. Civ. 74-46-ND, 76-77-NDPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DIRECTION FOR • ENTRY OF JUDGMENT

GIGNOUX, District Judge.

These two consolidated actions arise out of a collision which occurred at 0735 on the morning of August 21, 1974, when the dry cargo vessel FERNVIEW while attempting to dock at the Bangor & Aroostook Railroad Company (“BAR”) pier at Searsport, Maine collided with the south end of the pier causing considerable damage to the pier. The collision occurred under conditions of reduced visibility and heavy fog. BAR has brought an action in rem against the FERNVIEW (Civil No. 74-46-ND) and an action in…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. United States v. Reliable Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. The OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. The LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1866

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sterling v. Velsicol Chemical Corp.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1986
  2. Central Rivers Towing, Inc. v. City of BeardstownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  3. Glick v. Martin and Mohler, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. West v. City of St. PaulAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Claim of Gypsum Carrier v. Union Camp Corp.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API