Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Rothschild v. Richland County Board of Adjustment

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 10, 1992No. 23693PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chandler, Justice:

Edward Rothschild, d/b/a Video News (Rothschild), ap peals an Order holding constitutional, as applied to him, Article 8A of the Richland County Code of Ordinances. We affirm.

FACTS

Article 8A of the Richland County Code of Ordinances (ordinance) requires that sexually oriented businesses be situate in a C-3 zoning district, and be at least 1000 feet from a church, school, park, residential area, or another sexually oriented business. This ordinance, enacted August 19, 1987, provides a two-year period for compliance.

Rothschild operated three sexually oriented businesses from a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Richards v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  3. Edens v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  4. Robinson v. Richland County CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  5. Centaur, Inc. v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harkins v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Peoples Program for Endangered Species v. SextonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  3. Condor, Inc. v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  4. Captain Sandy's Tours, Inc. v. Georgetown County Building OfficialSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  5. City of Beaufort v. BakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API