Legal Opinion

Condor, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Appeals

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 10, 1997No. 24710PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Justice:

Appellants, operators of sexually oriented businesses, challenge the applicability and constitutionality of the City of North Charleston’s (City’s) Ordinance § 4-14 which, inter alia, restricts the location of sexually oriented businesses. Appellants contend: 1) there is no evidence they operated sexually oriented businesses in September 1992 and 2) the ordinance is unconstitutional as applied because it effectively “zones out” sexually oriented businesses from the City.

BACKGROUND

In September 1992, the City building administrator notified appellants they were operating…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Parker v. MorinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  3. Ex Parte McMillanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  4. Peterson Outdoor Advertising v. City of Myrtle BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  5. Centaur, Inc. v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harkins v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Bannum, Inc. v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. South Carolina Department of Corrections v. CartretteCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  5. South Carolina Department of Corrections v. TomlinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API