Lucas v. Hockett
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
DAVISON, Justice.
Joseph Paul Lucas (defendant below) appeals from a judgment granting Orville K. Hockett and Helen Hockett (plaintiffs below) a new trial.
The general proposition presented by this appeal is whether under all of the circumstances and after unanimous verdicts for the defendant, the trial court was justified in granting a new trial to plaintiffs on the ground of newly-discovered evidence. The particular issues are whether the alleged newly-discovered evidence was evidence the plaintiffs could not, with reasonable diligence, have discovered and produced at the trial, and whether…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Vickers v. Philip Carey Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- States Exploration Company v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Stills v. MayorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- DuBoise v. DuBoiseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Ralston v. TuckerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gorham v. GorhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Goss v. Oklahoma Blood InstituteCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
- LEWIS v. DUST BOWL TULSA, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
- LEWIS v. DUST BOWL TULSA, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
- West v. Cajun's Wharf, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.