Legal Opinion

United States v. Pierce

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided August 13, 1976No. ACM S24381PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

LeTARTE, Chief Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, the accused was convicted of dishonorably failing to maintain sufficient funds in his checking account for payment upon presentment of 15 checks totalling $1200.00, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934. He was sentenced to be discharged from the service with a bad conduct discharge and to be reduced in grade to airman basic.

Two of appellate defense counsel’s assignments of error pertain to alleged deficiencies in the staff judge advocate’s post-trial review. We need only discuss one of these wherein…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. HurtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  4. United States v. SeayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  5. United States v. GrishamUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. HoltCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  2. United States v. DeanU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
  3. United States v. JonesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
  4. United States v. HoltCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  5. United States v. RiversU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API