Legal Opinion · Dissent

Curley v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 1992Published

1DissentBellacosa, J.

I respectfully dissent and vote to reverse the order of the Appellate Division and reinstate the judgment of Supreme Court, predicated on a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $983,000.

This Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA) action to recover for permanently disabling back injuries sustained while plaintiff was employed as a police officer by the defendant Conrail is governed exclusively by well-settled Federal law principles (see, Basham v Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 372 US 699, 700-701, revg 11 NY2d 991, citing Lavender v Kurn, 327 US 645). Additionally, under New York precepts of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Lavender v. KurnSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Noseworthy v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API