San Francisco Teaming Co. v. Gray
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. Jas. M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCooper, P. J.
This action was brought to recover a balance claimed to be due for the use of teams and teamsters furnished by plaintiff to defendants at their request. Plaintiff recovered judgment, and this appeal is from the judgment and thé order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial.
There is only one question discussed in the briefs, and that is as to the ruling of the court in admitting, over the objection of defendants, a certain book called a work-book, containing the names of certain teamsters, the dates and number of loads hauled, the place from which and to where the loads were taken and the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chisholm v. Beaman Machine Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Chicago Lumbering Co. v. HewittCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1894
- Gould v. HartleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Swan v. ThurmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Dodge v. MorrowIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. RowlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Mercantile Trust Co. of S.F. v. DoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Wisconsin Steel Co. v. Maryland Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913
- Chandler v. RobinettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.