Legal Opinion

KALKASKA CTY. BD., ROAD COMM'RS v. Nolan

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 17, 2002No. Docket 221976PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Following a bench trial, defendants appeal as of right from the trial court’s entry of an injunction declaring that a roadway or trail crossing defendants’ rural acreage constituted a portion of Squaw Lake Road, a public road under the jurisdiction of plaintiff Kalkaska County Board of County Road Commissioners, and enjoining defendants from erecting or maintaining any barricades across the road. We affirm.

Defendants first contend that the trial court erred in concluding that Squaw Lake Road, including the disputed trail crossing their property, is the same road described in a 1935 McNitt act…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beulah Hoagland Appleton Qualified Personal Residence Trust v. Emmet County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Walters v. SnyderMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Neal v. GilmoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  4. City of Kentwood v. Sommerdyke EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Roebuck v. Mecosta County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Villadsen v. Mason County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Abcd Property Owners Association v. Robert HudspethMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API