Legal Opinion

Western Surety & Casualty Co. v. General Electric Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 27, 1988No. C7-88-949PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff Elroy Pinkert commenced an action against respondent General Electric Company (GE) for strict liability, negligent design, and breach of an implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose and an implied warranty of merchantability for injuries suffered in an alleged explosion of a GE 6014 headlight in his 1978 Ford Fiesta. Pinkert’s wife also asserted claims.

Appellant Western Casualty and Surety (Western) paid its insured, Pinkert, approximately $50,000 in economic loss benefits under Minnesota’s No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act. Western asserted…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bilotta v. Kelley Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Hudson v. Snyder Body, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Lee v. Crookston Coca-Cola Bottling CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  4. Plutshack Ex Rel. Plutshack v. University of Minnesota HospitalsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Holkestad v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Minnesota, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Chrysler Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Kapps v. Biosense Webster, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
  3. Shane Boda v. Viant Crane Service, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
  4. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I. v. Amazon.com, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2023
  5. Berkley National Insurance Co. v. Broan-Nutone, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2026

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API