Howard v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MANFORD, Judge.
Movant seeks to vacate his conviction and sentence pursuant to Rule 27.26. Relief was denied. The judgment is affirmed.
Movant alleges the trial court erred because (1) it found that his guilty plea was knowingly and voluntarily entered; (2) he did not admit his guilt of the offense charged and (3) he was misled by defense counsel.
Movant was charged, by indictment, with two counts of sale of a controlled substance (heroin) to a police officer on June 24, 1975. On June 2, 1976 and with counsel, movant entered his plea to one count. The prosecution agreed to and did dismiss the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Seales v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- McMahon v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Bradley v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Abrams v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Small v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Bandy v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Smallwood v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.