Legal Opinion

Smallwood v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 23, 1985No. 13934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Chief Judge.

Movant filed a motion under Rule 27.26 seeking to vacate a conviction of rape for which movant was sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment. The conviction occurred after “movant had entered a plea of guilty. Following an evidentiary hearing the trial court entered findings of fact and conclusions of law and denied the motion to vacate. Movant appeals.

Appellate review is to determine whether the trial court’s findings, conclusions, and judgment are clearly erroneous. Rule 27.-26(j). Those findings are clearly erroneous *47if the appellate court is left with a definite and firm…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Lockett v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Howard v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McDonald v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Samuels v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Crowe v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Hicks v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API