Bandy v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WASSERSTROM, Judge.
Bandy moved under Rule 27.26 to set aside three convictions which had been entered pursuant to his pleas of guilty. The trial court denied the motion, and Bandy appeals. We affirm.
Bandy’s sole point on appeal is that the trial court erred because his pleas of guilty were not knowingly and voluntarily made, he did not understand the nature of the charges against him, and there was no factual basis for the pleas. Although this point in terms attacks the validity of the pleas to all of the charges then pending against Bandy, the argument portion of Bandy’s brief deals only…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Rice v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- Matthews v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- Bounds v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. SkinnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Jones v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Green v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Baker v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Bandy v. WhiteDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985