Legal Opinion

Fitzkee v. Hoeflin

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 15, 1914No. Gen. No. 5,900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Henry county; the Hon. Fbank D. Ramsay, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1913. Certiorari denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carnes

Appellant, Elmer E. Fitzkee, filed a bill in chancery to reform a written contract between himself and appellee, Louis A. Hoeflin, and to enjoin a suit at law that had been brought by Hoeflin on that contract. He afterwards amended his bill praying that the contract be cancelled instead of reformed, and the case resulting in the dismissal of his bill for want of equity he prosecuted this appeal.

In the course of the proceeding there was a reference to the master in chancery and he reported the facts. The evidence is not shown in the record filed here but each party adopts the statement of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wilson v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Jordan v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  3. McClelland v. McClellandIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Allott v. American Strawboard Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Parker v. ShannonIllinois Supreme Court · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jackson City Bank & Trust Co. v. SternburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Nelson v. DavenportMontana Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API