Legal Opinion

Allen v. County of Jackson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 11, 1999No. 97-0009-L-1; CA A102891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Defendant Jackson County appeals from a judgment that granted summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs. ORCP 47. Plaintiffs cross-appeal. We dismiss the appeal and cross-appeal for lack of a final judgment.

In its brief, defendant provides a summary of undisputed facts that plaintiffs accept. That summary explains the events that led to the dispute between plaintiffs and defendant:

“In the general election of 1994, the voters of the state enacted Measure 8 which amended the state constitution to require that public employees contribute 6% of their compensation to their retirement accounts and to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oregon State Police Officers' Ass'n v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Bell v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Emmert Industrial Corp. v. DouglassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Swain v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allen v. County of JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Allen v. County of JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API