Legal Opinion

Pesek v. City of Brunswick

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided July 2, 1992No. 4:91-mc-00991PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

SAM H. BELL, District Judge.

Trial of this cause was held by this court without the intervention of a jury on April 21 and April 22, 1992. It was instituted with the filing of a complaint by plaintiff Raymond J. Pesek on May 22, 1991 against defendants the City of Brunswick (hereinafter Brunswick), Robert Trimble, Gregory Crane, and Tex Combs. The complaint seeks recovery pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and alleges primarily that defendants violated Pesek’s right of free speech under the first amendment to the United States Constitution in not allowing him…

2Cases cited88 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Jocham v. Tuscola CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
  2. Piscottano v. Town of SomersDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
  3. Bremiller v. Cleveland Psychiatric InstituteDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1995
  4. Scroggins v. City of Topeka, Kan.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998
  5. Zapach v. DismukeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API