Legal Opinion
Matter of Implicated Individual
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 27, 2021No. 29473PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
#29473-a-MES
2021 S.D. 61
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL BY AN IMPLICATED INDIVIDUAL. **** APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MINNEHAHA COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA **** THE HONORABLE JAMES A. POWER Judge **** MARTY J. JACKLEY STACY R. HEGGE of Gunderson, Palmer, Nelson, & Ashmore, LLP Pierre, South Dakota Attorneys for appellant. JEFFREY R. BECK Sioux Falls, South Dakota Attorney for appellee ProPublica. JON E. ARNESON Sioux Falls, South Dakota Attorney for appellee Argus Leader. **** ARGUED AUGUST 24, 2021 OPINION FILED…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Petition of Famous Brands, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Peterson, Ex Rel. Peterson v. BurnsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Uhre Realty v. TronnesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- Puffy's, LLC v. Dep't of HealthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
- Stockwell v. McCook County Board of CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- Lapin v. ZeetogroupSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
- Mohnen v. Estate of MohnenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.