Legal Opinion

Dyer v. Rich

District Court, N.D. Mississippi

Decided September 28, 1966No. GC6452PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

By this class action plaintiffs seek correction of population disparities which allegedly exist among the districts for the election of county supervisors in Washington County, Mississippi. These disparities, plaintiffs say, constitute invidious discrimination against plaintiffs and all other residents of the Third District — the class for whose benefit this action is being prosecuted. Defendants are the present members of the Board of Supervisors of Washington County.

At plaintiffs’ request, this three-judge district court was convened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2281 and 2284. In chronological…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gray v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Phillips v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Spielman Motor Sales Co. v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Ex Parte BransfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Ex Parte Public National Bank of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Klim v. JonesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970
  2. Carr v. Brazoria County, TexasDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1972
  3. Terk v. RuchDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1987
  4. Red Bird v. BerryDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API