Legal Opinion
Lenscrafters, Inc. v. Wadley
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided February 26, 2003No. 3:98-0150, 3:00-0096PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TRAUGER, District Judge.
Pending before the court are cross-Motions for Summary Judgment (Docket Nos. 163, 169) and responses thereto (Docket Nos. 197, 200) For the reasons discussed herein, the defendants’ motion will be granted, and plaintiffs’ motion will be denied.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
A. Evidentiary Matters
As an initial matter, plaintiffs refer to a number of documents in support of their Motion for Summary Judgment, as well as their Response to the defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, that defendants have objected to as inadmissible under Federal Rules…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of New York v. Milhelm Attea & Bros., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Lenscrafters, Inc. v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Lenscrafters, Inc. v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. MorrisonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- United States v. MorrisonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.