Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Transamerica Insurance Services

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1992No. Docket No. 92069PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, C.J.

This Court is asked to reconcile *510§ 3103C1)1 of the Michigan no-fault act,2 which requires owners of motorcycles3 to obtain public liability insurance, with § 34 of the off-road recreation vehicles act,5 which exempts owners of off-road recreation vehicles (orv), which include motorcycles,6 from the no-fault act’s insurance *511requirement. We hold that the no-fault act and the orv act, read together, demonstrate that, although motorcycles as defined by the no-fault act must be insured, motorcycles that meet the orv definition are exempt from the insurance requirement under § 3103 of the no-fault…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Gordon Sel-Way, Inc. v. Spence Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Malcolm v. City of East DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Girard v. WagenmakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Underhill v. Safeco InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Michigan Catastrophic Claims Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Walen v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Travelers Insurance v. U-Haul of Michigan, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Walker v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Miller v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API