Legal Opinion
Kohagen v. Harwood
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 30, 1950No. 10209PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAJOR, Chief Judge.
The complaint in this action discloses that plaintiffs and each of them are citizens and residents of the State of Minnesota. The defendant James R. Moore is a citizen and resident of the State of Wisconsin; the defendant Hamilton Manufacturing Company (hereinafter referred to as Hamilton) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Wisconsin, with its principal place 'of business in that State; the defendant Stanley Harwood (hereinafter referred to as Harwood) is a citizen and resident of the State of California, and the defendant Imperial…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanssenSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- McQuillen v. National Cash Register Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
- Vidal v. South American Securities Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Chase v. WetzlarSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gp Credit Co., LLC v. Orlando Residence, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Savage v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of TulsaDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1976
- Catanzaro v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1974
- Boris v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
- Cordner v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.