Legal Opinion
William Coltin & Co. v. Manchester Savings Bank
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided January 31, 1964No. 5182PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.
The transferred question is “whether or not a foreign, incorporated, real estate broker which has not complied with RSA Chapter 331-A relating to the licensing of real estate brokers and salesmen may maintain an action in the New Hampshire courts to recover a commission on an alleged brokerage agreement made in New Hampshire concerning property located in New Hampshire.”
The parties agree to the following facts: “The plaintiff in its writ alleges that on May 28, 1962 at Manchester, New Hampshire, the defendant agreed to pay to plaintiff a brokerage commission for the procurement of a ready,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Benham v. HeydeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
- Bickley v. Van Antwerp Realty CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- Harris v. Kent House Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1954
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kowalski v. Cedars of Portsmouth Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- Finlay Commercial Real Estate, Inc. v. PainoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- Ira H. Shinberg v. Paul BrukCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Blackthorne Group, Inc. v. Pines of Newmarket, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- In Re Sanborn, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.